Operating Discipline
Evaluate operating practices, shift routines, operator rounds, procedure adherence, and work control to identify execution gaps.
Operational Excellence & Operations Performance
NAES Asset Solutions provides independent, structured reviews of operating practices, O&M execution, staffing, procedures, management systems, and plant performance to help owners identify operational risk and prioritize measurable improvement.
Start here
Facilities can appear operationally sound while underlying weaknesses exist in execution, governance, or asset management. These issues can develop gradually and become normalized over time, even when they are contributing to performance variability, deferred work, or operating risk.
NAES Asset Solutions evaluates execution, not theory. The objective is to understand how operating practices, staffing, procedures, management systems, and O&M processes are functioning in the field, and where improvement priorities can be tied to reliability, availability, cost, and facility objectives.
The goal is not simply to identify gaps. It is to show owners which operational improvements matter most and why.
What the review can address
Evaluate operating practices, shift routines, operator rounds, procedure adherence, and work control to identify execution gaps.
Assess whether staffing levels, training, qualifications, and administrative controls align with plant objectives and operating requirements.
Compare key plant performance metrics with industry data to understand current performance position and improvement opportunity.
Connect operating practices and O&M execution to forced outages, startup failures, derates, backlog, and other sources of performance variability.
Evaluate fixed and variable O&M costs, labor and contractor utilization, and cost-to-risk alignment when appropriate data is available.
Review management systems, procedures, governance, and administrative controls that support consistent execution and reduce reliance on informal practices.
Why it matters
Operating practices and O&M execution can contribute to forced outages, startup failures, derates, and performance variability.
Staffing models, labor utilization, contractor strategy, backlog, and work execution influence recurring operating cost and resource efficiency.
Management systems, procedures, documentation, and execution discipline influence the facility’s ability to manage operational and compliance exposure.
Operational performance information can support acquisition transitions, reliability programs, life-extension planning, capital prioritization, and asset valuation decisions.
Assessment methodology
NAES tailors the scope to the owner’s objectives and combines multiple evidence sources rather than relying on a single document set or interview.
Deliverables
Where this fits
Evaluate current-state operations and O&M execution without committing to a larger program.
Use a broader cross-functional review to evaluate operations, maintenance, reliability, safety, environmental compliance, and management systems.
Use operational findings to support targeted reliability improvement and outage-reduction initiatives.
Support acquisition due diligence, asset transition, changes in staffing, or changes in operating strategy.
Use operating-performance findings as an input to long-term asset and capital decisions.
Focus specifically on day-to-day O&M execution, benchmarking, staffing, backlog, work control, and performance variability.
Related services
Evaluate O&M execution, staffing and contractor models, benchmarking, and OPEX decisions together.
Turn operational and reliability findings into a maintenance strategy aligned to criticality.
Strengthen the data and work-management systems that support consistent day-to-day execution.
NAES Asset Solutions helps owners evaluate operating practices, O&M execution, staffing, management systems, and performance data in one structured framework.